Vacuum Brazing with Dan Kay Archive
by Joseph
Braze Joint Design: “Percentage of Voids in a Joint can Increase with Overlap Distance”.
In my opinion, based on my experience, the amount of actual braze coverage in a joint is more important than the number of voids in that joint!.As discussed in last month’s blog-article, a lap-joint with an overlap of “3T-to-6T” (where “T” is the thickness of the thinner of the two members being brazed) is all that is needed to provide full strength and hereticity in a properly designed brazed joint (1T-to-3T for aluminum alloys). By this I am saying that we need to look at the amount of GOOD braze coverage, rather than being overly concerned with trying to count the number of voids in a joint! Counting voids is really the wrong way to approach the “goodness” of a brazed joint. by Dan Kay
by Joseph
Braze Joint Design: How Much Overlap is Enough?
A half century ago (back in the early 1960’s) a lot of research work was done by The American Welding Society (AWS) Committee on Brazing and Soldering to determine appropriate criteria for brazing lap joints (the preferred type of joint design for assemblies requiring the ability to withstand high pressure in service, such as gas bottles, etc.). The results were published in their committee report: AWS C3.1 in 1963, one of the recommendations of which was that joints should have an overlap of 3T or more, where “T” is the thickness of the thinner of the two sheet metal pieces being brazing together.Here’s how that recommendation came about. The AWS C3 committee arranged to conduct a series of round-robin testing in ten different laboratories around the country, using two different shear-type joint designs, four different base metals, and three different types of brazing filler metals (BFMs), for a total of about 1200 brazed shear test specimens. Their intent was not only to find out what constituted a satisfactory joint overlap design for brazing, but also to develop an easily reproducible test specimen that was “realistic” to the real-life world of brazed components in industry and which could become a “standard” that everyone could (and would) use to evaluate joint strength. by Dan Kay
by Joseph
Surface-Roughness of Parts to be Vacuum Brazed
Over the years it has shown that the best surface for brazing, generally speaking, is the “as-received” (as-rolled, as-drawn, as-machined, etc.) surface roughness of the material coming into the brazing shop. An illustration of what this surface roughness might look like, under high magnification, is shown in Fig. 1.Surface roughness obviously increases the total surface area of each faying surface inside the joint, when compared to a flat, polished surface. And, due to this “roughness”, it can be seen that there are many capillary paths for brazing filler metal (BFM) to follow between all the valleys and “peaks” on that roughened surface. by Dan Kay
by Joseph
Piping Atmosphere-gas to a Brazing Furnace
In many vacuum brazing applications, it is deemed necessary to use an atmosphere gas inside the vacuum furnace, perhaps to quench components following a vacuum-brazing run, or to perhaps build up a partial-pressure atmosphere inside the furnace to prevent the outgassing/volatilization of higher vapor-pressure metals, or perhaps merely to allow gaseous conduction of heat from part to part being brazed.
Whenever a gas is introduced into a vacuum furnace for a brazing operation, I’m always very concerned about the dewpoint of that gas, since dewpoint represents moisture in the gas, and moisture represents the presence of oxygen. In vacuum brazing of aluminum, moisture molecules present their own issues to the brazing process, in addition to their oxidizing characteristics. by Dan Kay
by Joseph
Dewpoint Control in Vacuum-Furnace Brazing
On a warm, moist day, our earth’s atmosphere will contain a significant amount of moisture in it. During the night, when the sun has gone down, this atmosphere will become cooled, and will not be able to hold onto the amount of moisture (water) that it could when it was warm, and so, some of that moisture will condense out onto the grass in the form of “dew”. Then, during the following day, when the sun heats the air up once again, the dew will evaporate from the ground.
It is well known that the warmer the gas, the greater will be the amount of moisture that gas can hold. At any given point in time, all gases will have what is called a “dewpoint”. The “dewpoint” of any gas is the temperature to which that gas must be cooled to get the first droplet of moisture to condense out of that gas (assumed to be at one standard atmosphere of pressure). The less the amount of moisture in that gas, the cooler must be the temperature to which that gas must be cooled in order to get the first condensation to occur. Based on that fact then, it will be understood that the lower the dewpoint of a gas, the drier (lacking moisture) is that gas. by Dan Kay
by Joseph
Mg-gettering in Vacuum Brazing of Aluminum
In last month’s article, we looked at the use of titanium-“getters” when vacuum-brazing high-temperature base-metals that are very sensitive to oxidation. In this month’s article, let’s look at how magnesium (Mg) is used as a “getter” when vacuum-brazing at temperatures of only about 1000-1100°F (540-600°C), as needed for joining aluminum base metals.
Magnesium (Mg), often referred to simply as “mag”, can be highly effective at gettering both oxygen and moisture that may be present in a vacuum-furnace atmosphere being used in aluminum-brazing operations. Aluminum (Al) reacts readily with oxygen to instantly form a tenacious Al-oxide layer on its surface. This Al-oxide layer is very stable, and, if mechanically removed, will quickly re-form. Thus, in real life, a layer of aluminum-oxide will constantly be present on the aluminum surface before, during, and after aluminum brazing. Dealing with that oxide layer has proven to be a challenge to many brazing shops over the years. by Dan Kay
by Joseph
Using Titanium “Getters” in Vacuum Brazing
Vacuum brazing is a growing industry, with more and more companies entering it each year, due primarily to the bright, clean, as-brazed component surfaces resulting from brazing in a vacuum environment, which, when conducted properly, allows brazed components to be used immediately, with no additional cleaning operations needed after brazing.Of course, that assumes that the vacuum furnace is clean and tight, with a minimal leak-up rate. Leak-up rate? What? Do vacuum furnaces leak? Yes, every vacuum furnace, unfortunately, is leaky! There are many fittings, connections, seals, etc., on each vacuum furnace, and it is very important that all such seals and connections be as leak-tight as possible. Otherwise, air will leak into the furnace through any of those potential leak-paths and the pressure inside the furnace will start to go back up toward atmospheric. This “leak-up” rate must be measured for each vacuum-brazing furnace, and that information made available to brazing personnel prior to starting any vacuum brazing cycle. by Dan Kay
by Joseph
Erosion of Base-Metals by Brazing Filler Metals
Erosion is defined in the AWS Brazing Handbook (published by the American Welding Society in 2007) as follows: “Erosion is a condition caused by the dissolution of the base metal by the molten brazing filler metal, resulting in a reduction of the base metal thickness.”
Thus, the phrase “base-metal erosion by the brazing filler metal” is used to describe a process in which a molten brazing filler metal (BFM) which is highly soluble in a given base-metal (parent metal), is applied to the surface of that base metal, is heated to brazing temperature, and in so doing, actively diffuses into that base metal, alloying extensively with (dissolving) it. by Dan Kay
by Joseph
X-Ray Inspection of Brazed Joints
Radiography (X-ray) is a means of looking at the inside of a braze joint without actually having to cut it apart to see it, as long as the appropriate conditions are met to allow its use. Radiography is heavily dependent on the thickness and mass of the part being radiographed.
In order for x-ray to yield a useful image of any voids or inclusions in a brazed joint, the thickness of that void or inclusion should be at least 2% of the thickness of the metal through which those x-rays are being sent, in order for it to be visible in a radiograph, or, if using real-time radioscopy (RTR) on a TV screen or monitor. The “2% Rule” in brazing is a very important guideline to follow, since it can effectively rule out radiography as a method for inspecting components that are too thick to be able to see any of the imperfections inside a braze joint. by Dan Kay
by Joseph
Liquid Penetrant Inspection in Brazing?
Although liquid-penetrant inspection, such as dye penetrant inspection (DPI) and fluorescent penetrant inspection (FPI), are useful tools for inspecting fusion-welds, they should NOT be used for inspecting brazed joints. This is especially true for any parts on which subsequent braze-repair may be required, such as many aerospace components that are vacuum-brazed, then placed in service for long periods of time, and then come back for later repair or rebuilding and then sent back out for more field-service.
DPI and FPI have long been used in the welding industry, and should certainly continue to do so, since weld-cracks and surface imperfections can readily be seen by these techniques and subsequently repaired without difficulties. by Dan Kay